03-26-2024, 07:38 AM
How would this need to work in order to be useful? I'm seeing two ways that it be done:
1. you could pass ch13-16 to remote ports 1-4, offering ~some~ individual port routings but not for all potential ports.
2. you would pass ch1-12 to remote ports 1-12 or 1-5 if using remote 7, duplicating the routings of the first unit.
It seems like it would be easier to implement solution 1 as it wouldn't require as much in the way of checking what's going on downstream and would offer individual port access, without doubling outputs.
3rd option would probably be something like a toggle for local or remote on the mod, so that if selected, it would only route to the remote device (if present)... This seems like it has more opportunity for problems as users may not have a remote device and if it got toggled by accident it may not work as expected, leading to problems.
What do you think?
1. you could pass ch13-16 to remote ports 1-4, offering ~some~ individual port routings but not for all potential ports.
2. you would pass ch1-12 to remote ports 1-12 or 1-5 if using remote 7, duplicating the routings of the first unit.
It seems like it would be easier to implement solution 1 as it wouldn't require as much in the way of checking what's going on downstream and would offer individual port access, without doubling outputs.
3rd option would probably be something like a toggle for local or remote on the mod, so that if selected, it would only route to the remote device (if present)... This seems like it has more opportunity for problems as users may not have a remote device and if it got toggled by accident it may not work as expected, leading to problems.
What do you think?